Defending the Judeo-Christian ethic, limited government, & the American Constitution
Monday February 13th 2012
Loading

Books by our contributors

Categories

Our Institutions Presuppose a Supreme Being — Justice William Orville Douglas

American Minute with Bill Federer

William Orville Douglas died JANUARY 19, 1980. He was a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court for 36 years, after having taught law at Yale and Columbia University.

In the 1952 case of Zorach v. Clauson, Justice Douglas wrote:

The First Amendment, however, does not say that in every and all respects there shall be a separation of Church and State … Otherwise the state and religion would be aliens to each other — hostile, suspicious, and even unfriendly…

Justice Douglas continued:

We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being … When the state encourages religious instruction … it follows the best of our traditions. For it then respects the religious nature of our people and accommodates the public service to their spiritual needs. To hold that it may not would be to find in the Constitution a requirement that the government show a callous indifference to religious groups. That would be preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe.

Justice William Douglas concluded:

We find no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion … We cannot read into the Bill of Rights such a philosophy of hostility to religion.

Bill FedererThe Moral Lib­eral con­tribut­ing edi­tor, William J. Fed­erer, is the best­selling author of “Back­fired: A Nation Born for Reli­gious Tol­er­ance no Longer Tol­er­ates Reli­gion,” and numer­ous other books. A fre­quent radio and tele­vi­sion guest, his daily Amer­i­can Minute is broad­cast nation­ally via radio, tele­vi­sion, and Inter­net. Check out all of Bill’s books here.



Notice: We encourage our writers & readers to focus their comments on principles & issues (pro and con) rather than on personal character attacks or party against party politics; and to point to solutions where possible. Ugly, emotional comments (especially profanity) are discouraged, will be edited or removed, and may lead to the permanent removal of its author from our community of friends. As a private enterprise we claim the right of offering something unique in politics. Please help us keep it that way. If you feel any writer or community member is consistently violating this standard, please let me know. -- Best to you, Steve Farrell, Editor In Chief

BigCommerce: The easiest way to sell online!