Defending the Judeo-Christian ethic, limited government, & the American Constitution
Monday February 13th 2012
Loading

Books by our contributors

Categories

ACLJ Extremely Disappointed With Federal Court Decision Blocking Key Provisions of AZ Immigration Law

Liberty Alerts, American Center for Law and Justice

(Washington, DC) – The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) said today it is extremely disappointed with a federal court decision that blocks key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law S.B. 1070 from taking effect.   The ACLJ, along with the Immigration Reform Law Institute, filed an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court in Phoenix on behalf of 81 members of Congress in support of Arizona’s new immigration law which is being challenged in federal court by the U.S. Department of Justice.

“This is a extremely disappointing decision that further harms the citizens of Arizona,” said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ.  “It is unfortunate that this court blocked key portions of Arizona’s  immigration law S.B. 1070 and failed to permit it to take effect in its entirety.  We believe the federal district court got it wrong and in its complex ruling has made it even more difficult for Arizona to protect and defend its borders.  We believe Arizona’s law compliments federal law and remain hopeful that the appeals process will ultimately produce a decision that underscores the fact that Arizona has a constitutional right to protect its citizens and defend its borders. This decision marks the beginning of a lengthy legal process that will have tremendous ramifications nationwide.”

The brief, which urged the court to reject the DOJ’s request for a preliminary injunction, explained that “Congress has plenary power over immigration law” and that Arizona’s S.B.1070 “does not interfere with U.S. foreign policy goals as prescribed by Congress” as the federal government asserts.

You can read the amicus brief here.

Led by Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow, the American Center for Law and Justice focuses on constitutional law and is based in Washington, D.C.

___________________________

Used with permission.



Notice: We encourage our writers & readers to focus their comments on principles & issues (pro and con) rather than on personal character attacks or party against party politics; and to point to solutions where possible. Ugly, emotional comments (especially profanity) are discouraged, will be edited or removed, and may lead to the permanent removal of its author from our community of friends. As a private enterprise we claim the right of offering something unique in politics. Please help us keep it that way. If you feel any writer or community member is consistently violating this standard, please let me know. -- Best to you, Steve Farrell, Editor In Chief

BigCommerce: The easiest way to sell online!