Defending the Judeo-Christian ethic, limited government, & the American Constitution
Thursday February 23rd 2012
Loading

From the Editor

"Dark Rose" by Steve Farrell “An enchanting story of faith and family that is as enlightening as it is encouraging.” -- Jon Dougherty, World Net Daily
"The most riveting, thought provoking book I've read in years." --Jeffrey Bennett, talk show host, World Wide Christian Radio

“…bursting with lessons in faith, forgiveness and family…it is a modern classic that will be enjoyed and passed along to friends and family for years to come.” -- Shane Cory, Washington Dispatch
"Destined to be a timeless classic, Dark Rose will touch the heart and bring hope to all who read it." -- NewsMax.com

Books by our contributors

Categories

Laser Hair Removal A Constitutional Right For Transgender Inmate

Liberty Alerts, Corruption Chronicles

In a classic “only in America” case, a federal court has found that prison officials in one state violated a transgender inmate’s constitutional rights by refusing to provide taxpayer-funded laser hair removal treatments.

The bizarre case comes from Massachusetts where a male inmate, who identities as female, is serving a sentence at a correctional institution in Norfolk. The criminal, Christine Alexander, was diagnosed with “gender identity disorder” in 2003 and receives hormone replacement therapy and psychological counseling as he progresses “towards feminization.”

As if this weren’t outrageous enough, Alexander also wants taxpayers to finance the cosmetic beauty treatment of laser hair removal because in his case it’s medically necessary, according to his attorneys. That’s because the inmate has a rare medical condition, according to court documents cited in a legal report this week; he “suffers from facial and body hair, and male pattern baldness.”

Evidently prison officials drew the line and refused the laser hair removal, so Alexander sued in federal court, claiming that corrections department officials are violating his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment and Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection. Alexander asserts in his complaint that the failure to provide him with laser hair removal (referred to as “medical treatment”) will lead to serious bodily harm, untreated mental illness and continued depression.

A federal judge in Massachusetts agreed, ruling that Alexander’s allegations are sufficient to establish that he has a serious medical need (presumably for laser hair removal) which has not been adequately treated under the Eighth Amendment standard. Appointed by Richard Nixon in 1972, the judge (Joseph Tauro) found that prison officials knew of Alexander’s need for “medical care” yet failed to provide it.

Many states across the county spend thousands of taxpayer dollars annually to provide transgender inmates—diagnosed with gender identity disorder—with hormone treatments, hair removal, makeup and women’s underwear. A few years ago a separate Massachusetts inmate, convicted of murdering his wife, sued the Department of Corrections to pay for an expensive sex-change surgery, claiming that he is a woman trapped in a man’s body.

For a couple of years Wisconsin was the only state with a law prohibiting the Department of Corrections from using tax dollars for transgender inmates’ hormone therapy or sex reassignment surgery. The measure was legally challenged and overturned by a federal court in 2010, however. The Clinton-appointed judge who heard the case ruled that denying convicted male felons hormones that help them look like women violates both the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. Only in America!

 


Used with permission of Judicial Watch.




Notice: We encourage our writers & readers to focus their comments on principles & issues (pro and con) rather than on personal character attacks or party against party politics; and to point to solutions where possible. Ugly, emotional comments (especially profanity) are discouraged, will be edited or removed, and may lead to the permanent removal of its author from our community of friends. As a private enterprise we claim the right of offering something unique in politics. Please help us keep it that way. If you feel any writer or community member is consistently violating this standard, please let me know. -- Best to you, Steve Farrell, Editor In Chief

  • Alan Weiss

    Dear SIr,

    It is only “bizarre” to you if you have no medical education.  Gender Identity Disorder (GID) is in the DSM IV and is a medical condition, almost always congenital in origin.  If the presumed goal is “correction” of the inmate (all systems are named “correctional” for a reason), AND if you are TRUE to your very own tagline (“Defending the Judeo-Christian ethic, limited government, & the American Constitution”), then presumably correcting what is often a ROOT CAUSE of a person’s criminal behavior seems to make a lot of sense. 

    Far from bizarre, it would likely turn this person into a model inmate, and it is certainly being generous of spirit, showing both grace and wisdom.  Are those NOT Christian virtues? 

    Bringing a person’s external appearance into line with their internal gender is standard medical practice and completely supported by science.

    My guess is that you’re just hung up about the cost of providing this medical care.  Fair enough.  Costs of incarceration ARE quite high.  How about ending the illegal Drug War (it is NOT Constitutional) and ending the war on law-abiding citizens being arrested and thrown in prison for juts carrying a gun, a violation of their 2nd Amendment rights?  That would save at least 40% in terms of dollars!

    But if this is REALLY because you find being transgendered bizarre, well, have you considered what it must feel like to BE transgendered?  Or do you find the mere existence of such people not God’s handiwork, too, put here for a reason?

    I request you recant your attitude and pray for humility and wisdom.

    Cordially,

    Alan R. Weiss

    • Gracetoo7

      A criminal, requiring hair removal, at the taxpayer’s expense, is not necessary. It is ridiculous. There are thousands, if not more, of transgender individuals who cannot afford these treatments, let alone the option of undergoing a sex change. And those people aren’t in prison. Why should it be handed to him? Let’s have all the NON CRIMINAL transgendered sue their insurance companies then. Criminals already get entirely too much, while the rest of us are ponying up the cash to take care of them. And I don’t believe anywhere in the article it was said transgendered people were bizarre, just the fact that we’d use taxpayer’s money so he doesn’t have a stache anymore.

  • Pingback: Laser Hair Removal IPL info » Blog Archive » Laser Hair Removal A Constitutional Right For Transgender Inmate