Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Thursday November 27th 2014

Self-Educated Man

lincoln family bible study


Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion


S.E.M., Vol. 1, No. 6


The President's Duty to Faithfully Execute the Law. According to Art. II, Sect. 3 of the Constitution, what is the President's duty? According to Lincoln, what does a man trample on, when he tramples on the law? According to Rep. Goodlatte, what is the value of strictly observing even bad laws until they are repealed? In a republic, why else, in your opinion, is obedience to laws put in place according to the process outlined in the Constitution, regardless of our personal opinions, important, if not vital?

Read full text of questions and respond.


Defending Business Owners From the Mandate

BY DAVID FRENCH, ACLJ

Americans don’t shed their constitutional rights when they open a for-profit business. While much of the attention surrounding the HHS mandates has focused on religious institutions, the Obama mandates also improperly restrict the liberties of private businesses. Today my colleagues at the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) filed the first lawsuit by a private business owner challenging Obama’s mandate. The suit, brought by Frank R. O’Brien and O’Brien Industrial Holdings, centers around a fundamental claim: Mr. O’Brien — a Catholic — “wishes to conduct his business in a manner that does not violate the principles of his religious faith.”

One of the great virtues of American capitalism is the ability of citizens to open and run businesses that not only sell products but also reflect the values and world view of the owner or shareholders (O’Brien’s values and goals include employees purchasing their own home, paying for college, and preparing for retirement). With the explosive growth of the regulatory state, business owners can often feel as if they’re working for the government from the moment they open their doors, and now the government is coercing employers to pay even for contraceptives and abortifacients. That’s a bridge too far.

The multiplicity of business regulations has misled the government into thinking its power to regulate is unlimited and that the act of operating a for-profit business somehow delegitimizes the values and viewpoint of the owner. Mr. O’Brien believes the First Amendment still applies to entrepreneurs, and now the dispute moves to federal court in the Eastern District of Missouri.

This article is crossposted at National Review Online.


David French is a Senior Counsel for the ACLJ. A Kentucky native, David is a 1994 graduate (cum laude) of Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts and a 1991 graduate (summa cum laude, valedictorian) of Lipscomb University in Nashville, Tennessee.


Used with the permission of the American Center for Law and Justice.