Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Wednesday October 1st 2014

Self-Educated Man

lincoln family bible study

Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion

Federalist 58 by James Madison. 1. Under the proposed Constitution whose interests were represented by the U.S. Senate? Is it so today? If not, how might it be remedied & by what means? 2. How did the Constitution provide for updating representation in Congress? 3. Madison credits the U.S Constitution with assigning the greatest power, that of the “purse strings” to the U.S. House. In your opinion, how might the House assert that power to reduce the size & cost of government today? 4. Explain in your own words Madison’s warning against too many men serving in the House. How might his warning be applied today as calls abound for a more direct democracy & for scrapping the electoral college system? 5. Is democracy the form of government our Founders gave us or was it a republican form? Explain the difference.

TML is syndicated by:

Google News (Internet)

Newstex - No. 1 Rated Authoritative Content

Panetta: Global Warming a Threat to ‘National Security’

Secretary Panetta says 'global warming' is a national secuirty threat. Conservatives warn of a U.N. power grab.


Defense Secretary Leon Panetta declared global warming to be a “national security” threat in a speech to an environmentalist group in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

“The area of climate change has a dramatic impact on national security,” Panetta told the Environmental Defense Fund, according to the Armed Forces Press Service.

“Rising sea levels, severe droughts, the melting of the polar caps, the more frequent and devastating natural disasters all raise demand for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief,” Panetta said.

The defense chief cited the melting of Arctic ice as a reason for the Senate to re-address the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea treaty which has languished for more than a decade. Some 150 nations have signed onto the treaty since the late 1990s, and some U.S. administrations have urged its passage.

“We are the only industrialized nation that has not approved that treaty,” Panetta said, urging the group to push for its ratification.

Among other things, the treaty would allow various aspects of U.S. military overflights and passage.

The treaty was initially rejected by Ronald Reagan during his presidency, but successive administrations, including those of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, have pushed for it’s passage.

Reagan rejected it “in 1982 due to its innate conflict with basic free-market principles (e.g., private property, free enterprise, and competition),” the conservative Heritage Foundation said in a summary of the treaty.

“Secondly, former President Reagan believed that the Treaty would restrict the world’s supply of minerals. The Treaty was originally designed to limit the exploitation of heavy minerals in order to protect the mineral sales of land-locked, developing nations. This is no longer a severe limitation, because production limits to preserve land-based mining have been removed,” said the summary.

Other critics say the treaty gives up too much U.S. sovereignty to the UN.

Panetta also discussed concern over energy-related threats to national security that are not linked to climate change.

“I have a deep interest in working to try to ensure from a security perspective that we take measures that will help facilitate and maintain power in the event of an interruption of the commercial grid that could be caused, for example, by a cyber attack which is a reality that we have to confront,” he said.

© 2012 Newsroom America.