Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Thursday July 10th 2014

Self-Educated Man

lincoln family bible study


Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion


Federalist 58 by James Madison. 1. Under the proposed Constitution whose interests were represented by the U.S. Senate? Is it so today? If not, how might it be remedied & by what means? 2. How did the Constitution provide for updating representation in Congress? 3. Madison credits the U.S Constitution with assigning the greatest power, that of the “purse strings” to the U.S. House. In your opinion, how might the House assert that power to reduce the size & cost of government today? 4. Explain in your own words Madison’s warning against too many men serving in the House. How might his warning be applied today as calls abound for a more direct democracy & for scrapping the electoral college system? 5. Is democracy the form of government our Founders gave us or was it a republican form? Explain the difference.


TML is syndicated by:

Google News (Internet)

Newstex - No. 1 Rated Authoritative Content

Justice Dept. Plans to Sue Arizona Sheriff Arpaio

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio (photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

JON E. DOUGHERTY, NEWSROOM AMERICA

The Justice Department said Wednesday it plans to sue Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio for alleged civil rights violations that includes racial profiling of Latinos.

The department says it has been attempting to work with Arpaio to train his Maricopa County deputies in making constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people who have been arrested and reach out to the Latino community, to let members know his department is also there to protect them, the Associated Press reported.

Arpaio has vehemently denied his department engages in racial profiling. He has also resisted the appointment of a court monitor because he says every policy decision made would then have to be cleared through an observer and, in essence, nullify his authority.

Justice Department officials said they informed Arpaio’s lawyer April 3 that his refusal to accept a court-appointed monitor would not be acceptable and that the department would commence legal proceedings against him in the form of a federal lawsuit.

The “notice of intent to file civil action” was sent to an Arpaio lawyer Wednesday by Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez, who heads up the department’s civil rights division.

Perez has said it’s been more than 100 days since his department’s findings were provided to Arpaio and his department, but that federal authorities have not met with the sheriff’s department to discuss a consent agreement, AP reported.

Arpaio has maintained that federal authorities have consistently mischaracterized his department and his policies, and he remained defiant in the face of the lawsuit threat.

“If they sue, we’ll go to court. And then we’ll find out the real story,” he said Wednesday. “There’s lots of miscommunication emanating from Washington. They broke off communications.

“They’re telling me how to run my organization. I’d like to get this resolved, but I’m not going to give up my authority to the federal government. It’s as simple as that,” he said.

Separate from the lawsuit, a federal grand jury has been investigating Arpaio’s office over allegations of criminal abuse of power since late 2009, focusing on the sheriff’s department’s anti-corruption squad.

© 2012 Newsroom America.