Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Thursday October 2nd 2014

Self-Educated Man


lincoln family bible study


Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion


Federalist 58 by James Madison. 1. Under the proposed Constitution whose interests were represented by the U.S. Senate? Is it so today? If not, how might it be remedied & by what means? 2. How did the Constitution provide for updating representation in Congress? 3. Madison credits the U.S Constitution with assigning the greatest power, that of the “purse strings” to the U.S. House. In your opinion, how might the House assert that power to reduce the size & cost of government today? 4. Explain in your own words Madison’s warning against too many men serving in the House. How might his warning be applied today as calls abound for a more direct democracy & for scrapping the electoral college system? 5. Is democracy the form of government our Founders gave us or was it a republican form? Explain the difference.


TML is syndicated by:

Google News (Internet)

Newstex - No. 1 Rated Authoritative Content

Good News Club Case Argued Today at Court of Appeals

Secularism 101: Freedom to debauch school children but not inspire them, freedom to assault their belief in the existence of God but never affirm it, freedom to declare as tyranny Founder Marx did, that 'there is no morality,' nor 'eternal laws' but only moral relativism, but never to declare as the American Founders did that there is "a Higher Law" with attending moral absolutes which have a fixed connection to our belief in and defense of inalienable rights and limited govt. - Steve Farrell: The Moral Liberal - Photo credit: Good News Club

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, LIBERTY COUNSEL

Minneapolis, MN – Today at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Liberty Counsel is representing Child Evangelism Fellowship of Minnesota (CEF), the sponsor of Good News Clubs (GNC), against Minneapolis Special School District No. 1, for unfairly denying equal access and opportunity to after-school programs. CEF has been an approved member of the Minnesota Public Schools Community Partners since 2000 and participated in the after-school program from 2005-2009. In 2009, a school employee determined to revoke CEF’s after-school program because the GNC included prayer and “proselytizing.”

The district concedes that all 242 members of the Community Partners are private speakers, not government or school speakers. Community Partners are allowed some access after school. From this group, the district invites groups for preferred or additional access opportunities. Included in these 40 or more groups are the Scouts. The district concedes that the GNC and the Scouts address character development, morals, and respect, but it claims GNC is different because of prayer and religious perspective. The district court sided with the school district, citing to the Supreme Court case of Good News Club v. Milford, but erroneously relied on Justice Stevens’ opinion as “concurrence,” when in fact it was a “dissent” that was explicitly rejected by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, along with every federal court to consider Good News Clubs, has ruled that GNCs must be provided the same access provided to the Scouts. These courts, including the Supreme Court, have ruled that prayer and proselytizing are protected religious viewpoints. As the Court held in Good News Club v. Milford, “speech discussing otherwise permissible subjects cannot be excluded from a limited public forum on the grounds that the subject is discussed from a religious viewpoint.”

Mathew Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, will be presenting oral argument today before a panel of three judges. Staver commented, “The law is crystal clear. Christian or other religious viewpoints are constitutionally protected. Public schools must provide equal access for Christian viewpoints and Christian clubs. There is no constitutional basis to discriminate between Good News Clubs and the Scouts or other similar groups that address similar subject matters. The First Amendment is a benefit, not a disability. Private speech endorsing religion is fully protected by the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.”

Used with the permission of Liberty Counsel.