Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Wednesday September 17th 2014

Self-Educated Man

lincoln family bible study

Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion

Federalist 58 by James Madison. 1. Under the proposed Constitution whose interests were represented by the U.S. Senate? Is it so today? If not, how might it be remedied & by what means? 2. How did the Constitution provide for updating representation in Congress? 3. Madison credits the U.S Constitution with assigning the greatest power, that of the “purse strings” to the U.S. House. In your opinion, how might the House assert that power to reduce the size & cost of government today? 4. Explain in your own words Madison’s warning against too many men serving in the House. How might his warning be applied today as calls abound for a more direct democracy & for scrapping the electoral college system? 5. Is democracy the form of government our Founders gave us or was it a republican form? Explain the difference.

TML is syndicated by:

Google News (Internet)

Newstex - No. 1 Rated Authoritative Content

Schlafly: Will We Have Three-Parent Families?


In California, some day a judge will have the power to decide who is your father, who is your mother, and who is your third parent. That won’t happen this year because Governor Jerry Brown vetoed a bill passed by the California Legislature that would have permitted a judge to recognize more than two parents of a child. The judge said he needed “more time to consider all of the implications” of this change in our family structure.

People say that such legislation recognizing more than two parents of a child is probably inevitable because of the complicated childbearing situations that are taking place today. The case that motivated the bill that Brown vetoed was the case of a California girl named “M.C.”. She had inspired California’s Senator Mark Leno’s so-called multiple-parent bill. He claims “the definition of family is evolving.” The director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights said she is “very optimistic” about getting this bill approved next year. The Executive Director of the California Family Council warns that such a law would permit courts to overlook a child’s biological ties in favor of someone else with a big bank account. A couple of law professors issued a plea for the rejection of this three-parent law. They said, “When it comes to parenting, three’s a crowd.

The big problem is the breakdown of the family unit. Babies are increasingly being born outside of marriage, leading to legal battles over who is the baby’s father. Same-sex couples are making babies with the eggs, sperm and wombs of unrelated persons who are usually separated from the baby’s life. The sponsors of this three-parent bill say that judges should have the explicit authority to rule on “the best interest of the child,” a terrible rule that gives the judge discretion to do whatever he wants.

Contributing Editor, Phyllis Schlafly, is the Founder and President of Eagle Forum, a national radio show host, and a best-selling author.

Used with the permission of Eagle Forum.

The Moral Liberal recommends: Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman’s Crusade (Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America)