Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Thursday July 31st 2014

Self-Educated Man

lincoln family bible study


Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion


Federalist 58 by James Madison. 1. Under the proposed Constitution whose interests were represented by the U.S. Senate? Is it so today? If not, how might it be remedied & by what means? 2. How did the Constitution provide for updating representation in Congress? 3. Madison credits the U.S Constitution with assigning the greatest power, that of the “purse strings” to the U.S. House. In your opinion, how might the House assert that power to reduce the size & cost of government today? 4. Explain in your own words Madison’s warning against too many men serving in the House. How might his warning be applied today as calls abound for a more direct democracy & for scrapping the electoral college system? 5. Is democracy the form of government our Founders gave us or was it a republican form? Explain the difference.


TML is syndicated by:

Google News (Internet)

Newstex - No. 1 Rated Authoritative Content

John Adams: Hungry Learner, Content with Realities’ Constraints

John AdamsTHEY WERE BELIEVERS WITH STEVE FARRELL

All my time seems to roll away unnoticed. I long to study sometmes, but have no opportunity. I long to be a master of Greek and Latin. I long to prosecute the mathematical and philosophical sciences. I long to know a little of ethics and moral philosophy. But I have no books, no time, no friends. I must therefore be contented to live and die an ignorant, obscure fellow.

Although John Adams was ultimately wrong about where his hunger versus where the reality of his situation would take him, it is a philosophical note which perhaps tempered with a little bit more faith in eventual outcomes (which he also possessed), and well, the relative importance of each outcome to eternity, which is worthy of all of us to relate to and consider.

Or to this observance of Adam’s I might add, “With God nothing is impossible,” a matter of faith to which we ought to tap into in the achievement of our worthy goals; and yet, we read the balancing holy injunction as well that we are encourage to be “content with our wages.” Or in other word’s, in God’s Providence, the possible is not necessarily the Providential.

And so if I were to sum the wisdom of Adams here from his college diary, let us learn all we can, exercise all the influence we can, make as many true friends as we can; and yet, at the end of our day, and the end of our lives,  be content with what God gives us after all we can do and all he wisely decides to add to it.


Source: John Adams Diary, 24 March 1756.


Return to “Called Unto Liberty” Home Page.


They Were Believers is researched, compiled, and edited by The Moral Liberal Founder and Editor In Chief, Steve Farrell. Steve served as one of the original and most popular pundits at NewsMax.com (1999-2007), and is the author of the highly praised inspirational novel, Dark Rose. Copyright © 2012 Steve Farrell.


The Moral Liberal recommends George Washington’s Sacred Fire