Defending the Judeo-Christian Ethic, Limited Government, & the American Constitution
Tuesday July 22nd 2014

Self-Educated Man

lincoln family bible study


Read along with us; share your insights, ask questions, post a link that adds to the discussion


Federalist 58 by James Madison. 1. Under the proposed Constitution whose interests were represented by the U.S. Senate? Is it so today? If not, how might it be remedied & by what means? 2. How did the Constitution provide for updating representation in Congress? 3. Madison credits the U.S Constitution with assigning the greatest power, that of the “purse strings” to the U.S. House. In your opinion, how might the House assert that power to reduce the size & cost of government today? 4. Explain in your own words Madison’s warning against too many men serving in the House. How might his warning be applied today as calls abound for a more direct democracy & for scrapping the electoral college system? 5. Is democracy the form of government our Founders gave us or was it a republican form? Explain the difference.


TML is syndicated by:

Google News (Internet)

Newstex - No. 1 Rated Authoritative Content

The Change Liberals Want Most

schlafly 2BY PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY

If liberals could change the United States Constitution any way they like, what would they most want to change? The answer is in a new book by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who for more than three decades wrote liberal decisions, before retiring in 2010 and allowing President Obama to fill his position with another liberal judge. Justice Stevens was particularly supportive of abortion in his decisions, even insisting at one point that the Constitution requires taxpayers to pay for abortions. (Harris v. McRae, one of the four dissenting Justices) Justice Stevens has just written a new book entitled Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution. The book is being promoted as the first time a retired Supreme Court Justice has told us how we should change the Constitution.

And what does Stevens want to change? His first priority is getting rid of the Second Amendment, which guarantees to Americans the right to keep and bear arms. The retired Justice Stevens wants to take away the right of Americans to own guns.

This fundamental right to own a gun, which was considered by the Founders to be basic to a free society, has long been a major target of liberals who oppose the conservative values at the heart of our Nation. If Congress call a new convention under Article V, you can bet that rewriting the Second Amendment to allow gun control would be a top priority of many of the delegates. It’s amazing the way that some Republicans are working hard to give liberals the opportunity to do precisely that. Of course, the media would do everything it can to help liberals remove or weaken the Second Amendment so gun control can be imposed. And now the gun-control liberals have the support of a retired Supreme Court justice. Our goal should be to defend the Constitution, not to rewrite it.


The Moral Liberal recommends: Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman’s Crusade (Politics and Society in Twentieth-Century America)


Contributing Editor, Phyllis Schlafly, is the Founder and President of Eagle Forum, a national radio show host, and a best-selling author.


Used with the permission of Eagle Forum.